A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_subcategory_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
Circular No.201/7/2023-GST (Circulars- CGST)

: Clarifications regarding applicability of GST on certain services – reg.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited VS Union of India]

It is erroneous to assume that the application, which is accompanied by the documents as specified under Rule 89(2) of the Rules, is required to be treated as complete only after the taxpayer furnishes the clarification of further documents as may be required by the proper officer and that too from the date such clarification is issued.

ODISHA HIGH COURT [Ranjan Naik Vs Joint Commissioner of CT & GST, Berhampur Range, Ganjam]

Payment of pre-deposit can be made by using the Electronic Credit Ledger.

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT [Annadurai Muniswamy Vs The Additional Commissioner Office of The Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Commissionerate, Bengaluru]

It is seen that this Notification dated 31.03.2023 enables a registered person, whose registration has been cancelled under the provisions of Section 29(2)(b) or (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on or before 31.12.2022 and who has not filed any application for revocation of cancellation of such registration within the specified time under Section 30 of the CGST Act, to file an application for revocation in terms of the specific procedure notified.

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT [Anandkumar Ramdeo Singh Vs The Commissioner (Appeals-I) GST and Central Tax ]

The petitioner has impugned the second respondent`s order for cancellation of the GST registration under the provisions of Section 29 of the CGST Act. If the cancellation is under the provisions of Section 29(2)(b) or ( c) of the CGST Act and such cancellation is before 31.12.2022, and an application for revocation is not filed, it is submitted that in terms of this notification, the petitioner will be entitled to file an application according to the special procedure now notified.

GUJARAT HIGH COURT [Aahana Sales Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India]

The Hon’ble High Court by way of interim relief, directed that the goods of the petitioner as well as the vehicle shall be released provided the petitioner complies with certain conditions

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT [Sheetal Mittal Vs State of Rajasthan, Through PP, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur]

This Court is not inclined to grant the anticipatory bail to the accused petitioners.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT [Sadhna Jayesh Raichura Vs Rise2sky Developers LLP]

The controversy between the parties primarily revolves around the liability to pay GST which is yet not crystallized. It would be expedient to dispose of the appeal by putting terms on the basis of the undertaking furnished by the Plaintiff as to payment of GST

GUJARAT HIGH COURT [Radhe Packaging Vs Union of India]

The petitioner may approach the competent authority to avail the benefit of Notification No. 03/2023 - Central Tax and seek revocation of the cancellation of registration.

ODISHA HIGH COURT [Pratap Kumar Pradhan Vs Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha]

Since the petitioner wants to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching the 2nd appellate tribunal, which has not yet been constituted, as an interim measure subject to the Petitioner depositing the entire tax demand within a period of four weeks from the today, the rest of the demand shall remain stayed during the pendency of the writ petition.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Natarajan Satheesh Kumar Vs The Superintendent, Pollachi Range II (Centre), Pollachi West]]

Since the order of cancellation, in this case, is 14.09.2022, the scheme of Amnesty for all assessees in whose cases registration was* canceled prior to 31.12.2022 will be applicable to the petitioner subject to satisfaction of all conditions set out thereunder.

[Tanmit Singh Through Poa Zaid Mohammad Shaikh Vs The state of Gujarat]

In view of the fact that the goods have been auctioned by authority, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that in such circumstances of the case, conveyance may be released and the petitioner is ready and willing to give sufficient amount of bond for the remaining amount of fine in lieu of conveyance.

Page: