Welcome To E-Data Book!

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Prem Infrastructure Private Limited Vs State of UP and 2 Others ]

1. Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

ODISHA HIGH COURT [ Satyam Castings Pvt. Ltd., Cuttack Vs Deputy Director, DGGI, Bhubaneswar and Another, Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of GST, Bhubaneswar and Another]

Since both the writ applications are based on same set of facts and pleadings on record, they have been heard together and they are being disposed of by the present common order and judgment.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Jai Prakash Shiv Charan Bidi Through Its Proprietor Shri Jai Prakash Sahu VS Commissioner, Commercial Taxex And Another ]

1. Heard Mrs. Pooja Talwar, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Krishna Machine Tools Vs State of U.P. And Another]

1. Heard Shri Parth Goswami, holding brief of learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Anil Agency Vs Assistant Commissioner Commercial Tax And Another]

1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [S.S. Suppliers Vs State of U.P. And Another ]

1. Heard Sri Niraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner-assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Chemsilk Commerce Pvt. Ltd Vs State of U.P. And Another]

1. Having heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, it remains undisputed that the petitioner`s registration under the UPGST Act, 2017 was cancelled on 6.5.2019 w.e.f. 31.1.2019. It is not the case of the revenue that the said registration has ever been revived or that the petitioner ever sought revival of that registration.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Sadhna Kohli Vs Sales Tax Officer Hon`ble Justice]

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 21.02.2020 whereby the GST Registration of the petitioner was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017. Petitioner also impugns Show Cause Notice 07.01.2020.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Hansraj Tiles World Vs Commissioner of DGST Delhi & Ors.]

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 13.02.2024 whereby the appeal of the Petitioner has been dismissed solely on the ground that the same is barred by limitation. Petitioner also impugns order dated 29.06.2021 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017 and also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 11.03.2021.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai ]

Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Modern Steel Vs Additional Commissioner Grade 2 and Another]

1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Hitachi Astemo Gurugram Powertrain Systems Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Auth. Signatory, Rajasthan Vs Addl. Comm. Office Prin. Comm. (Branch Adjudication) Central G.S.T. Central Excise, Lko. and 2 Others ]

(1) Sri Dipak Seth, learned senior counsel for opposite party nos.1 and 2 has filed preliminary objection against maintainability of the present writ petition filed against the order of assessment on the ground that the petitioner having a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [here-in-after referred to as ‘CGST Act, 2017 for the sake of brevity] for adjudication of disputed questions of law and fact may not be well within his right to bypass the remedy of appeal.

Page: