ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Ansal Hi-tech Town Ships Limited Vs State of UP and 2 Others]

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration. The petitioner submitted that the order for cancellation of registration has been passed without any application of mind. This court is of the view that the orders impugned herein are liable to be set aside.

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT [Sonu Vs State of Haryana]

The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 439 Cr.PC with a prayer to grant regular bail. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Sip Academy India Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Director Sarala Kulasekaran Vs State Tax Officer]

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the assessment orders pertaining to assessment years 2017-18. The petitioner submits that the impugned assessment order was issued without considering the petitioner`s replies and that such orders disclose non-application of mind. This writ petition is allowed and the orders impugned herein are quashed. As a corollary, this matter is remanded for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Origin B.R. Digitalsigns Private Ltd. Manglapuri Thru. Authorised Signatory Himanshu Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Institutional Finance, Lucknow and Others]

By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the assessment order creating demands of Rs. 2,85,58,320/- against the petitioner. In the present case not providing copy of the SIB report has severely prejudiced the case of the petitioner and accordingly on this ground alone the proceedings are arbitrary being in violation of the principles of natural justice. The matter is remitted back to the adjudicating authority to provide the petitioner a copy of the SIB report and any other material which forms basis of the demands issued against the petitioner.

Will Clean Energy CESS on imported Coal @ Rs. 400 PMT continue to be applicable in GST?Will Clean Energy CESS on imported Coal @ Rs. 400 PMT continue to be applicable in GST?

No. Clean Energy Cess is being repealed. Coal, however, will be subject to compensation cess @ Rs 400/- per tonne

Can u clarify for 40? benefit on closing stock does 1 year limit apply or not ?

Deemed credit will be available for all stock procured within a 1 year period

DELHI HIGH COURT [Rane Brake Lining Limited Vs Superintendent, Range-17, Central GST Division]

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 09.01.2023 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled. Petitioner also impugns the order dated 16.01.2024 whereby the application of the petitioner seeking revocation has also been dismissed.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Delhi Polymers Vs Commissioner, Trade and Taxes & Anr]

1. Petitioner has filed the appeal impugning order of cancellation of registration dated 15.12.2021 whereby the GST registration of the Petitioner has been cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017. Petitioner also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 04.09.2021.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Shree Ram Glass Bachauli Kuftabad Beekapur Thru. Partner Shree Aman Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. State Tax U.P Govt]

1. Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Standing counsel on behalf of the respondents.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Selvaraj Subramaniam Proprietor of Sri Kalki Cotton Traders Vs The Assistant Commissioner, The Commercial Tax Officer,]

The petitioner assails an order dated 16.08.2023 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner. The petitioner was a registered person under applicable GST laws. According to the petitioner, he was unaware of the issuance of a show cause notice dated 15.06.2023 calling upon him to appear before the Commercial Tax Officer on 22.06.2023 in relation to the proposed cancellation of his GST registration. Since he was unaware of the show cause notice, it is stated that the petitioner did not reply thereto. Meanwhile, an intimation in Form GST DRC-01A was issued to the petitioner on 12.07.2023 in relation to the assessment period July 2017 to March 2018. The petitioner replied thereto on 27.07.2023. In these circumstances, it is stated that the petitioner was shocked to receive the impugned order of cancellation of his registration.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Quess Corp Limited Represented by Its Authorised Signatory Bharat Agarwal Vs Deputy Commissioner]

The petitioner assails an assessment order dated 09.10.2023. The petitioner is engaged in the business of providing technology enabled staffing and outsourcing services. As a registered person under applicable GST laws, the petitioner had filed its returns. In relation thereto, the petitioner first received a notice in Form GST ASMT-10. In response, the petitioner requested for an adjournment. Thereafter, an intimation in Form GST DRC-01A dated 11.07.2023 was received by the petitioner in respect of four issues. This was followed by the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 18.08.2023. Once again, by citing the revamping of its tax team, the petitioner requested for an adjournment. However, the order impugned herein came to be issued. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Apshara Garments Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr]

1. Petitioner impugns the order dated 15.01.2024 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled with effect from 03.12.2021.

Page: