GUJARAT HIGH COURT [LM Corporation Vs The state of Gujarat]

The show cause notice and order of cancellation of registration are quashed and set aside. The certificate of registration is restored forthwith.

GUJARAT HIGH COURT [Milap Enterprise Through Prop. Roopa Milap Vasani Vs Union of India]

The order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner is hereby quashed and set aside. The registration of the petitioner is restored forthwith.

ODISHA HIGH COURT [Shiva Jyoti Construction Vs The Chairperson, Central Board of Excise & Customs ]

The Petitioner before this Court seeks a direction to the Opposite Parties to permit the Petitioner to rectify the GST Return filed for the period September, 2017 and March 2018 in Form-B2B instead of B2C as was wrongly filed under GSTR-1 in order to get the Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit by M/s. Odisha Construction Corporation Limited (OCCL), the principal contractor. The Court permits the Petitioner to resubmit the corrected Form-B2B under GSTR-1 for the aforementioned periods September 2017 and March, 2018, and to enable the Petitioner to do so a direction is issued to the Opposite Parties to receive it manually

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT [Skylark Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India]

The core issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the transaction of supply of manpower by the petitioner to a company in Rajasthan is an inter-state transaction taxable as CGST+RGST, or it is an intra-state transaction liable to be taxed as IGST. The issue of inter-state transaction/intra-state transaction is a legal issue, though depending upon the facts of the case and as such, requires deeper consideration. List this petition for admission/final disposal after six weeks.

KERALA HIGH COURT [Pappachan Chakkiath Vs Assistant Commissioner Cto North Paravur The Joint Commissioner of State Tax Kochi, The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax Kochi]

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging an order issued by the respondent under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Acts. This court is of the view that the petitioner has not made out any case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as I cannot find that the impugned orders are issued without jurisdiction. The writ petition fails. It is accordingly dismissed.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Vinayagamoorthy Tyres Represented By Its Parnter P.K. Srinivasan Vs Deputy State Tax Officer, Deputy Commissioner]

The petitioner is a partnership firm. It is a registered dealer under the erstwhile TNVAT Act. Proceedings were initiated owing to alleged difference in GSTR 1 & 3B on one side and GSTR 3B & 2A on the other. Captioned Writ Petition is disposed of as allowed albeit making it clear that if the respondents are to initiate proceedings afresh, it is open to the respondents to do so and all the rights and contentions of both sides are preserved if proceedings are initiated afresh by the respondents.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Vab Apparel LLP Vs Commissioner, Delhi GST]

The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 23.05.2022 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’) canceling the petitioner’s GST registration with effect from 05.03.2018. The said order was passed pursuant to a Show Cause Notice dated 19.05.2022 (hereafter ‘the SCN’).

TRIPURA HIGH COURT [Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Vs State of Tripura]

The petitioner has filed the instant case challenging the order which has been passed without providing any reasons. In the instant case, the impugned order does not reflect the reasons for passing of the impugned order rejecting the Trans-1 credit and for imposition of a huge amount of tax, interest, and penalty against the petitioner, the impugned order is accordingly set aside and the matter is remanded back to the respondent authorities to issue a fresh proceeding in accordance with law.

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT [Harsh Polyfabric Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India]

By this writ petition petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the Appellate Authority under relevant provision of West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules, 2017. This is not a case where any violation of principles of natural justice has been committed or any procedural irregularity has been committed by the authority in passing the impugned order or violation of any specific statutory provision of law has been committed by the Appellate Authority concerned in passing the impugned order. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed.

PATNA HIGH COURT [Manoj Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar, the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Madhubani]

Not only the order is non-speaking, but cryptic in nature and the reason of cancellation not decipherable therefrom. Principles of natural justice stand violated and the order needs to be quashed as it entails penal and pecuniary consequences

Page: