A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_subcategory_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Anita Traders Lko. U.P. Thru. Proprietor Aneeta Sharma VS State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of State Tax

The High Court quashed the demand order and show cause notice issued under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, ruling that they were beyond the prescribed time limit. The court held that the retrospective extension of time did not apply to cases where the limitation period had already expired. The petitioner’s accounts are ordered to be de-freezed.

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT [Binoy Kolay VS Senior Joint Commissioner, State Tax]

The petitioner received an adjudication order for FY 2017-18 and appealed against it, but the appeal was rejected due to delay. Meanwhile, a second adjudication order was mistakenly issued. The Court quashed the duplicate order, recognized the appellate authority’s failure to exercise jurisdiction, condoned the delay, and directed a fresh appeal hearing on merit within twelve weeks.

ORISSA HIGH COURT [Parija Enterprises, Cuttack . VS State of Odisha and Others]

The petitioner challenged the rejection of their GST appeal for being time-barred. The appeal pertained to an order issued during the Covid-19 pandemic, which the petitioner claimed to have been unaware of. The court acknowledged the impact of the pandemic and exercised its extraordinary powers to set aside the dismissal, restoring the case to the Assessing Officer.

[Circular No. 246/26/2025-GST]

Clarification on applicability of late fee for delay in furnishing of FORM GSTR-9C

Notification No. 07/2025 (Central Tax Rate)

Seeks to amend Notification No 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017 to implement the recommendations of the 55th GST Council..

Notification No. 08/2025 (Central Tax Rate)

Seeks to amend Notification No 17/2017- Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017 to implement the recommendations of the 55th GST Council.

[Circular No. 247/26/2025-GST]

Clarification regarding GST rates & classification (goods) based on the recommendations of the GST Council in its 55th meeting held on 21st December, 2024, at Jaisalmer.

Notification No.01/2025-Integrated Tax (Rate),

A new entry is added S. No. 98B.The entry for S. No. 15 is expanded to include "Fortified Rice Kernel (FRK)". The term "pre-packaged and labelled" is redefined in the Explanation to cover retail commodities up to 25 kg or 25 liters

Notification No.02/2025-Integrated Tax (Rate)

New entries are introduced in the schedule S. No. 105A. It specifies that commodities intended for retail sale, pre-packed in units of not more than 25 kg or 25 liters.

Notification No.03/2025-Integrated Tax (Rate)

The amendment eligibility for concessional tax rates by including food inputs used in fortified rice kernel production for government welfare schemes.

Notification No.04/2025-Integrated Tax (Rate)

The amendment raises the IGST rate on the specified item under S. No. 4 from 12% to 18%, effective immediately.

Notification No.05/2025-Integrated Tax (Rate)

These amendments refine the definitions and processes concerning "specified premises" for hotel accommodations. Annexure VII are newly introduced.

Page: