A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_subcategory_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
DELHI HIGH COURT [Smartadmedia Through Its Sole Proprietore Navdeep Singh Sahni Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr]

The petitioner seeks refund under CGST Act, 2017. Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST outlines procedures. Proper officer must expedite processing within two weeks as per Section 54(7). Petition disposed, with liberty to pursue further remedies if needed.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [ Gupta Mentha Oil Commission Agent Vs State of UP and 2 Others]

The penalty order under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act, 2017, post-search, is deemed unjustified per precedent. Orders quashed, directing refund of deposited tax and penalty within four weeks. Writ petition allowed.

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT [Huda Urban Estate and Town and Country Planning Employees Welfare Organization Vs Union of India and Others]

The petitioner challenges the modification of GST Act`s person definition by Section 7(1)(aa) of Finance Act, 2021, contending it disrupts mutual transactions. Stay granted on demand notice pending reply. Next hearing on 03.09.2024.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [ Mid Town Associates Vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal), Judicial Division Iind, State Tax, Moradabad & Other]

It is clear that only violation is a technical one wherein E-Way Bill was not present in the vehicle. However, it is clear that the E-Way Bill had been downloaded prior to the interception of the vehicle. Furthermore, invoice and the E-Way Bill matched with the goods in the vehicle, and accordingly, one can infer that there was no mens rea for the evasion of tax.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT [Mahesh Devchand Gala Vs Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Dept. of Revenue), Central Goods and Service Tax, Mumbai, Pappu Kumar, Inspector, CGST & Central Excise Mumbai, State of Maharashtra ]

1. By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of his arrest by the respondent No. 3-Inspector, CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai (West Commissionerate) and for a declaration that the said arrest is illegal and contrary to law. Other prayers are also sought, including the prayer for interim cash bail / regular bail.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Sarvashree Bala Ji Enterprises VS State of U.P. and 2 Others]

Orders cancelling registration lacked reasoned application of mind. Both orders were quashed. Petitioner to reply to show cause notice. Adjudicating authority to reevaluate with due process. Writ petition allowed.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Fateh Chand Bhagwan Das Vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal) -2 Commercial Tax and Another]

1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Sahu Enterprises Vs State of U.P. and Another]

1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue.

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT [Agrawal Namkeen Vs Goods and Service Tax Council, State of Rajasthan, Union of India, Joint Commissioner, Circle A, Enforcement Wing, Rajasthan-I, Additional Commissioner, State Tax, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Custom]

2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that various notifications passed from time to time conferring powers on various authorities for the purposes of exercise of powers under Section 73 of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2017”) and other provisions have been placed on record.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Veekesy Footgear Private Limited VS State of UP and 2 Others ]

1. Heard Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Awadh and Company Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 2 Others]

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

JAMMU & KASHMIR HIGH COURT [VJ Jindal Cocoa Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India and Others ]

The petitioner, who was expecting immediate release of its claim felt aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents and, as such, filed the instant petition seeking, inter alia, a direction to the respondents to disburse the amount of Budgetary Support already sanctioned by respondent No. 5 in its favoiur with interest in a time bound manner.

Page: