The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and de-freeze the petitioner`s bank account, upon the production of proof of deposit of Rs. 83,000/- or 10% of the total demand made by the respondent.

The question on which advance ruling is sought by the applicant is not covered under any of the clauses under sub-section (2) of section 97 of the GST Act. This authority is of the view that there may not be any reason to accept the application made by the applicant for pronouncement of ruling. The application, therefore, is rejected.

he petitioner was issued a show cause notice asking him to show cause as to why the registration certificate issued under the CGST Act in his favour should not be cancelled due to non-furnishing of returns in terms of Section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017 for a continuous period of six or more months. This writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner shall approach the concerned authority within a period of two months from today seeking restoration of his GST registration.

The question on which advance ruling is sought by the applicant is not covered under any of the clauses under sub-section (2) of section 97 of the GST Act. This authority is of the view that there may not be any reason to accept the application made by the applicant for pronouncement of ruling. The application, therefore, is rejected.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed assailing the order whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay tax along with interest and penalty. This court is of the considered opinion that interest of justice would require that the petitioner be granted an opportunity of being heard after which an appropriate order be passed by the State Tax Officer in accordance with law.

Varun Beverages I Video Feed

IREDA I General

Natco Pharma I Tweet

Allcargo I News Article

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd I General

IRCTC I News Article

Technical analysis has been published for ACLGATI I Long