A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_subcategory_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT [Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Regional Unit, Jamshedpur Vs Nikita Mittal]

The instant case is dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, disposed of.

MADRAS HIGH COURT [Udhayan Steels Private Limited, Rep. By Its Director Selvan Vs Deputy State Tax Officer (Int.) Roving Squad, Coimbatore

The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order on the short ground that the impugned proceedings are barred by the limitation prescribed under Section 129(3) of the GST Act, 2017. The impugned proceedings are set aside and the vehicles/goods in question shall be released forthwith.

TELANGANA HIGH COURT[Shree Siddivinayak Publications Vs The Joint Commissioner]

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order passed by the respondent canceling the GST registration of the petitioner as well as the order-in-appeal passed by the respondent dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of cancellation of GST registration. This court is of the view that it would be just and proper if respondent gives a fresh opportunity of hearing to the petitioner since the matter pertains to cancellation of GST registration adversely effecting its business operations.

Difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) available in GSTR-2B & ITC claimed in the GSTR-R3B

Difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) available in GSTR-2B & ITC claimed in the GSTR-R3B

Comprehensive Guide and Instructions for Direct API Integration with Any of the 6 IRPs for E-Invoice Reporting

Comprehensive Guide and Instructions for Direct API Integration with Any of the 6 IRPs for E-Invoice Reporting

Advisory for the procedures and provisions related to the amnesty for taxpayers who missed the appeal filing deadline for the orders passed on or before March 31, 2023

Advisory for the procedures and provisions related to the amnesty for taxpayers who missed the appeal filing deadline for the orders passed on or before March 31, 2023

GUJARAT HIGH COURT [Secutech Automation (India) Private Limited Vs State of Gujarat .....Respondent]

By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking to quash and set aside the order of cancellation of registration of Petitioner Company. The petition stands allowed, quashing and setting aside the order. The cancellation of registration is revoked

KERALA HIGH COURT [Pankaj Cottage Vs The Goods and Service Tax Officer, Central Tax and Central Excise]

The petitioner is in this court aggrieved by order cancelling the registration granted to the petitioner under the CGST Act. The action taken by the officer by initiating proceedings in form GST REG-31 of the CGST Rules and completing the proceedings for cancellation of registration by issuing order is clearly without jurisdiction. If the Officer wishes to initiate proceedings for cancellation of registration, he must issue a notice as specified in Rule 21 of the CGST Rules and in form GST REG-17 and not in form GST REG-31.

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT [Modicum Enterprise (OPC) Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax/Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Shibpur Charge & Ors]

On the ground of non-filing of the return, the respondent should not initiate fresh proceeding for cancellation of the registration.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Rekha Saxena Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi]

The matter is remitted to the Appellate Authority to examine the same on merits.

Page: