A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: Trying to get property 'blog_child_category_subcategory_id' of non-object

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
MADRAS HIGH COURT [Exide Industries Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Large Taxpayers Unit-I, Chennai]

It is crystal clear that reasonable opportunity ought to be given to a person to show cause and depending upon the facts of each case, even further extension of time can be granted by the Assessing / Adjudicating Officer. In any event, the decision to refuse or extend time ought to be exercised with sound reasons and not in an arbitrary or capricious manner. The circular dated 26.09.2022 of the respondent also clearly stipulates that the communication granting time or refusal to grant time shall also be sent to the assessee.

ODISHA HIGH COURT [Nilamadhaba Enterprises Vs CT & GST Officer, Cuttack]

Since the petitioner wants to avail the remedy under the provisions of law by approaching the 2nd appellate tribunal, which has not yet been constituted, as an interim measure subject to the Petitioner depositing the entire tax demand within a period of fifteen days from the today, the rest of the demand shall remain stayed during the pendency of the writ petition

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT [Gajraj Vahan Private Limited Vs The State of Jharkhand, The Commissioner of State Taxes, Jharkhand, The Joint Commissioner of State Taxes, Hazaribagh, The Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes, State Goods and Service Tax, Hazaribagh]

It is apparent from the record that the petitioner made payment in the wrong head and there is no dispute regarding the same. However, his claim for refund has been rejected by the authority on the ground of limitation vide order dated 23.4.2020

ODISHA HIGH COURT [Jogesh Kumar Dehury VS Additional CT & GST Officer, Angul Circle, Angul]

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order by which assessment under Section 63 of the OGST Act has been made against the petitioner. The assessment order is set aside and the Petitioner may appear before the Assessing Officer and furnish objection, if any

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT [Balaji Electricals Vs Appellate Authority and Joint Commissioner State Tax Sagar]

This Court has no manner of doubt that the very initiation of the proceedings by way of show cause notice (Annexure P-1) is vitiated for the same being vague.

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COUR [Durge Metals Thr. Its Proprietor Shri Gopal Sharan Tamrakar S/O Shri Krishan Sharan Tamrakar Vs Authority And Joint Commissioner State Tax Thr. Sagar Division]

The court observed that mandatory provisions of Section 74 make it incumbent upon the Revenue to ensure the SCN to be speaking enough to enable the assessee to respond to the same. It neither contained the material and information nor the statement containing details of ITC transaction under question

DELHI HIGH COURT [TK Elevator India Private Limited (Earlier Known As Thyssenkrupp Elevator (India) Private Limited VS Assistant Commissioner GST]

The impugned order may be set aside and the matter be remanded to the concerned authority to pass an order afresh after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.

PATNA HIGH COURT [Singh Caterers and Vendors Vs The Union of India, The State of Bihar, The Principal Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna, The Additional Commissioner of State Tax Audit, East Division, Patna, The Joint Commissioner State Tax, Kadamk]

There is no reason why the writ petition should be entertained specifically when the rectification application, on which basis the proceedings under section 73 is sought to be kept in abeyance, cannot be invoked fruitfully by the petitioner.

DELHI HIGH COURT [APJ Investments Pvt Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax Wazirpur Division CGST Delhi West]

The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning a Show Cause Notice and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Considering the circumstances, this court is of the view that it would be apposite to restore the petitioner’s application for revocation of cancellation of its GST registration before the concerned officer for deciding afresh

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT [(Jai Bharath Travels Vs The Deputy Commissioner (St), The Deputy Commissioner (Intelligence), The Assistant Commissioner, The State of Andhra Pradesh, the Union of India]

The main contention of the petitioner was that the bifurcation of AC and NON-AC tickets was not taken into account. However, assessment was done on both AC and NON-AC buses and also data was received for revenue from third parties.

DELHI HIGH COURT [Alex Tour and Travel Private Limited .....Appellant Vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Division-Janakpuri]

The court did not appreciate the insistence on the part of the Revenue for the appellant to file fresh applications for the refund. The respondent counsel stated that fresh applications for refund or Show Cause Notices would not be necessary.

Page: