GST UPDATE

????Desk of CA. Praveen Sharma Series-481????

Employers typically charge a nominal fee for these canteen services, raising questions about the GST implications of such transactions. Under GST law, the definition of "supply" is broad, potentially encompassing a variety of transactions, including those without monetary consideration. According to Section 7(1)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, supply includes certain activities made without consideration as detailed in Schedule I, notably the provision of goods or services between related parties, like employers and employees, in the course of business.

Given this broad definition, canteen services provided to employees, whether free or for a nominal charge, are considered a supply. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarified in a 2017 press release that employer to-employee perquisites outlined in employment contracts are not subject to GST, aiming to clear ambiguities. However, confusion persists, especially regarding transactions deemed neither a supply of goods nor services under Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017.

The tax liability hinges on whether a service is considered a supply, and the tax base for GST calculation. When canteen services are offered by employers to employees, determining the GST's value becomes complex, particularly because these transactions occur between related parties. The GST law and rules provide methodologies for valuing such supplies, generally leaning on open market value or comparable goods and services when direct valuation is challenging.

Input Tax Credit (ITC) eligibility for GST paid on canteen services is a contentious issue. Generally, GST paid on business-related purchases can offset liability on sales. However, certain expenses, including those on food and beverages, are excluded from ITC claims under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, except in cases where such services are legally mandated employee benefits.

Advanced Rulings on the matter, such as those for Musashi Auto Parts and Tata Motors, indicate that ITC for GST paid on mandatory canteen services is not permissible, challenging the principle of free flow of credit envisioned in the GST framework. These rulings underscore the nuanced interpretation of the law, particularly the separate treatment of various sub-clauses within Section 17(5)(b), and their implications for GST credit eligibility.

Employers must navigate several scenarios regarding canteen services, each with distinct GST implications. These range from direct invoicing to employees (exempt from GST) to complex arrangements where both employer and employees share costs. Understanding these scenarios is vital for correct GST treatment and compliance.

In summary, the GST treatment of canteen services provided to employees is multifaceted, with implications for supply definition, tax valuation, and credit eligibility. While certain employer-provided services are exempt from GST, the overarching goal is compliance and accurate tax reporting. This analysis highlights the intricate relationship between employee welfare measures under the GST regime and the need for clear guidelines to ensure both compliance and the intended benefit flow to employees.

Read more: https://www.edatabook.com/c-detail/3888

Check Draft reply of GST Notice and Appeal format in our EdataBook

Stay tuned and Save my number for any query +91-9871530610.

CA. Praveen Sharma 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/capraveensh